Hi,
On 2023-01-23 19:21:00 -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Michael seemed to support this idea and nobody verbalized hatred of it,
> so I implemented it. In v15, we have shared_memory_size_in_huge_pages,
> so this adds effective_huge_pages.
>
> Feel free to suggest a better name.
Hm. Should this be a GUC? There's a reason shared_memory_size_in_huge_pages is
one - it's so it's accessible via -C. But here we could make it a function or
whatnot as well.
I'm ok with this being a GUC, it doesn't feel elegant, but I suspect there's
no realistic elegant answer.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
