Re: wake up logical workers after ALTER SUBSCRIPTION - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: wake up logical workers after ALTER SUBSCRIPTION
Date
Msg-id 20221214000145.GA638663@nathanxps13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: wake up logical workers after ALTER SUBSCRIPTION  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: wake up logical workers after ALTER SUBSCRIPTION  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 06:32:08PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Before, there was up to 1 second (with multiple "SELECT count(1) = 0"
> probes from the test script) between the ALTER SUBSCRIPTION command
> and the "apply worker will restart" log entry.  That wait is pretty
> well zapped, but instead now we're waiting hundreds of ms for the
> "apply worker has started" message.
> 
> I've not chased it further than that, but I venture that the apply
> launcher also needs a kick in the pants, and/or there needs to be
> an interlock to ensure that it doesn't wake until after the old
> apply worker quits.

This is probably because the tests set wal_retrieve_retry_interval to
500ms.  Lowering that to 1ms in Cluster.pm seems to wipe out this
particular wait, and the total src/test/subscription test time drops from
119 seconds to 95 seconds on my machine.  This probably lowers the amount
of test coverage we get on the wal_retrieve_retry_interval code paths, but
if that's a concern, perhaps we should write a test specifically for
wal_retrieve_retry_interval.

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Paul Ramsey
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] random_normal function
Next
From: Ian Lawrence Barwick
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal for internal Numeric to Uint64 conversion function.