On 2022-Dec-01, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Patch reverted in all back branches. I was hoping to get support for
> more aggressive backpatches of docs, but obviously failed. I should
> have been clearer about my intent to backpatch, and will have to
> consider these issues in future doc backpatches.
FWIW I am in favor of backpatching doc fixes (even if they're not
completely trivial, such as 02d43ad6262d) and smallish additions of
content (63a370938). But we've added a few terms to the glossary
(606c38459, 3dddb2a82) and those weren't backpatched, which seems
appropriate to me.
--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"The problem with the facetime model is not just that it's demoralizing, but
that the people pretending to work interrupt the ones actually working."
(Paul Graham)
