On 2022-Nov-21, sirisha chamarthi wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 10:56 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
> wrote:
> > Instead I'm going to do what Ashutosh mentioned at the start, which is
> > to verify both the restart_lsn and the invalidated_at, when deciding
> > whether to ignore the slot.
>
> Sounds good to me. Thanks!
Done now. I also a new elog(DEBUG1), which I think makes the issue a
bit easier notice.
I think it would be even better if we reset the underlying data from
effective_catalog_xmin ... even with this patch, we show a non-zero
value for a slot in status "lost" (and we ignore it when computing the
overall xmin), which I think is quite confusing. But we can do that in
master only.
Thanks for reporting this issue.
--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
