Hi,
On 2022-11-16 21:58:39 -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 07:48:14PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> > I've used this a bunch on personal branches, and I think it's the way to
> > go. It doesn't take long, saves a lot of cycles when one pushes something
> > broken. Starts to runs the CompilerWarnings task after a minimal amount of
> > sanity checking, instead of having to wait for a task running all tests,
> > without the waste of running it immediately and failing all the different
> > configurations, which takes forever.
>
> Well, I don't hate it.
>
> But I don't think you should call "ccache -z":
Agreed - that was really just for "development" of the task.
I also don't like my "cores_script". Not quite sure yet how to do that
more cleanly.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
