On 2022-Oct-20, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> I think elsewhere in the code we reset dangling pointers either ways -
> before or after deleting/resetting memory context. But placing them
> before would give us extra safety in case memory context
> deletion/reset fails. Not sure what's the best way. However, I'm
> nullifying the dangling pointers after deleting/resetting memory
> context.
I agree that's a good idea, and the patch looks good to me, but I don't
think asserting that they are null afterwards is useful.
--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
