Re: Standby recovers records from wrong timeline - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kyotaro Horiguchi
Subject Re: Standby recovers records from wrong timeline
Date
Msg-id 20221020.173413.1707884971077804841.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Standby recovers records from wrong timeline  (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Standby recovers records from wrong timeline
List pgsql-hackers
Sorry, a correction needed..

At Thu, 20 Oct 2022 17:29:57 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote in 
> At Wed, 19 Oct 2022 18:50:09 +0300, Ants Aasma <ants@cybertec.at> wrote in 
> > When standby is recovering to a timeline that doesn't have any segments
> > archived yet it will just blindly blow past the timeline switch point and
> > keeps on recovering on the old timeline. Typically that will eventually
> > result in an error about incorrect prev-link, but under unhappy
> > circumstances can result in standby silently having different contents.
> > 
> > Attached is a shell script that reproduces the issue. Goes back to at least
> > v12, probably longer.
> > 
> > I think we should be keeping track of where the current replay timeline is
> > going to end and not read any records past it on the old timeline. Maybe
> > while at it, we should also track that the next record should be a
> > checkpoint record for the timeline switch and error out if not. Thoughts?
> 
> primary_restored did a time-travel to past a bit because of the
> recovery_target=immediate. In other words, the primary_restored and
> the replica diverge. I don't think it is legit to connect a diverged
> standby to a primary.
> 
> So, about the behavior in doubt, it is the correct behavior to
> seemingly ignore the history file in the archive. Recovery assumes
> that the first half of the first segment of the new timeline is the
> same with the same segment of the old timeline (.partial) so it is
> legit to read the <tli=1,seg=2> file til the end and that causes the
> replica goes beyond the divergence point.
> 
> As you know, when new primary starts a diverged history, the
> recommended way is to blow (or stash) away the archive, then take a
> new backup from the running primary.
> 
> If you don't want to trash all the past backups, remove the archived
> files equals to or after the divergence point before starting the
> standby. They're <tli=2,seg=2,3> in this case. Also you must remove

<tli=2,seg=2,3> => <tli=1,seg=2,3>

> replica/pg_wal/<tli=2,seg=2> before starting the replica. That file
> causes recovery run beyond the divergence point before fetching from
> archive or stream.

<tli=2,seg=2>  => <tli=1,seg=2> 

regards.

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: Standby recovers records from wrong timeline
Next
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply