On 2022-Oct-01, Andres Freund wrote:
> Perhaps the END{} routine should call $node->_update_pid(-1); if $exit_code !=
> 0 and _pid is undefined?
Yeah, that sounds reasonable.
> That does seem to reduce the incidence of "leftover" postgres
> instances. 001_start_stop.pl leaves some behind, but that makes sense, because
> it's bypassing the whole node management. But I still occasionally see some
> remaining processes if I crank up test concurrency.
>
> Ah! At least part of the problem is that sub stop() does BAIL_OUT, and of
> course it can fail as part of the shutdown.
I made teardown_node pass down fail_ok=>1 to avoid this problem, so we
no longer BAIL_OUT in that case.
> But there's still some that survive, where your perl.trace doesn't contain the
> node getting shut down...
Yeah, something's still unexplained. I'll get this pushed soon, which
already reduces the number of leftover instances a good amount.
--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
