> On Wed, 5 Oct 2022 at 16:30, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > One other point to discuss: should we consider back-patching? I've
> > got mixed feelings about that myself. I don't think that cases where
> > this helps significantly are at all mainstream, so I'm kind of leaning
> > to "patch HEAD only".
At Mon, 10 Oct 2022 13:24:34 +0100, Simon Riggs <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com> wrote in
> It looks fine to eventually backpatch, since StandbyReleaseLockTree()
> was optimized to only be called when the transaction had actually done
> some AccessExclusiveLocks.
>
> So the performance loss is minor and isolated to the users of such
> locks, so I see no problems with it.
At Wed, 5 Oct 2022 12:00:55 -0700, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote in
> +1. It can always be back-patched in the future if there are additional
> reports.
The third +1 from me.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
