Re: Switching XLog source from archive to streaming when primary available - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: Switching XLog source from archive to streaming when primary available
Date
Msg-id 20221008215221.GA894639@nathanxps13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Switching XLog source from archive to streaming when primary available  (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Switching XLog source from archive to streaming when primary available
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 07:49:21PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> SwitchFromArchiveToStreamEnabled() seemed better at this point. I'm
> attaching the v7 patch with that change. Please review it further.

As I mentioned upthread [0], I'm still a little concerned that this patch
will cause the state machine to go straight from archive recovery to
streaming replication, skipping recovery from pg_wal.  I wonder if this
could be resolved by moving the standby to the pg_wal phase instead.
Concretely, this line

+                if (switchSource)
+                    break;

would instead change currentSource from XLOG_FROM_ARCHIVE to
XLOG_FROM_PG_WAL before the call to XLogFileReadAnyTLI().  I suspect the
behavior would be basically the same, but it would maintain the existing
ordering.

However, I do see the following note elsewhere in xlogrecovery.c:

 * The segment can be fetched via restore_command, or via walreceiver having
 * streamed the record, or it can already be present in pg_wal. Checking
 * pg_wal is mainly for crash recovery, but it will be polled in standby mode
 * too, in case someone copies a new segment directly to pg_wal. That is not
 * documented or recommended, though.

Given this information, the present behavior might not be too important,
but I don't see a point in changing it without good reason.

[0] https://postgr.es/m/20220906215704.GA2084086%40nathanxps13

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding Support for Copy callback functionality on COPY TO api
Next
From: Andrew Borodin
Date:
Subject: Re: Amcheck verification of GiST and GIN