At Thu, 29 Sep 2022 12:35:04 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote in
> > Thank you for the feedback!
> > I agree that the messages should be more clear.
> > \\!: command was not executed
> > \\!: command failed
> > Would these two messages be enough to describe the two cases?
>
> FWIW, I would spell these as something like this:
>
> > \\!: command execution failure: %m
The following might be more complient to our policy.
> \\!: failed to execute command \"%s\": %m
> > \\!: command returned failure status: %d
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
