Re: [PATCH]Feature improvement for MERGE tab completion - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [PATCH]Feature improvement for MERGE tab completion
Date
Msg-id 20220921104000.64a2pp3wmhwlo37u@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH]Feature improvement for MERGE tab completion  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2022-Sep-21, Fujii Masao wrote:

> How about adding something like PartialMatches() that checks whether
> the keywords are included in the input string or not? If so, we can restrict
> some tab-completion rules to operating only on MERGE, as follows. I attached
> the WIP patch (0002 patch) that introduces PartialMatches().
> Is this approach over-complicated? Thought?

I think it's fine to backpatch your 0001 to 15 and put 0002 in master.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera         PostgreSQL Developer  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"I can't go to a restaurant and order food because I keep looking at the
fonts on the menu.  Five minutes later I realize that it's also talking
about food" (Donald Knuth)



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Add common function ReplicationOriginName.
Next
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: Refactor backup related code (was: Is it correct to say, "invalid data in file \"%s\"", BACKUP_LABEL_FILE in do_pg_backup_stop?)