Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson - v11 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Subject | Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson - v11 |
Date | |
Msg-id | 20220824153008.i7pnmh7xilqhsnej@awork3.anarazel.de Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson - v11 (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>) |
Responses |
Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson - v11
Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson - v11 Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson - v11 |
List | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On 2022-08-24 11:39:06 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > I have looked at your branch at 0545eec895: > > 258f6dc0a7 Don't hardcode tmp_check/ as test directory for tap tests > 8ecc33cf04 Split TESTDIR into TESTLOGDIR and TESTDATADIR > > I think these patches are split up a bit incorrectly. If you apply > the first patch by itself, then the output appears in tab_comp_dir/ > directly under the source directory. And then the second patch moves > it to tmp_check/tap_comp_dir/. If there is an intent to apply these > patches separately somehow, this should be cleaned up. How is that happening with that version of the patch? The test puts tap_comp_dir under TESTDIR, and TESTDIR is $(CURDIR)/tmp_check. There was an earlier version of the patch that was split one more time that did have that problem, but I don't quite see how that version has it? > I haven't checked the second patch in detail yet, but it looks like > the thought was that the first patch is about ready to go. > > 834a40e609 meson: prereq: Extend gendef.pl in preparation for meson > > I'm not qualified to check that in detail, but it looks reasonable > enough to me. > > See attached patch (0001) for a perlcritic fix. Thanks. > 97a0b096e8 meson: prereq: Add src/tools/gen_export.pl > > This produces leading whitespace in the output files that at least on > darwin wasn't there before. See attached patch (0002). This should > be checked again on other platforms as well. Hm, to me the indentation as is makes more sense, but ... > Other than that this looks good. Attached is a small cosmetic patch (0003). I wonder if we should rewrite this in python - I chose perl because I thought we could share it, but as you pointed out, that's not possible, because we don't want to depend on perl during the autoconf build from a tarball. > e0a8387660 solaris: Use versioning scripts instead of -Bsymbolic > > This looks like a good idea. The documentation clearly states that > -Bsymbolic shouldn't be used, at least not in the way we have been > doing. Might as well go ahead with this and give it a whirl on the > build farm. Cool. I looked at this because I was confused about getting warnings with autoconf that I wasn't getting with meson. > 0545eec895 meson: Add docs > > We should think more about how to arrange the documentation. We > probably don't want to copy-and-paste all the introductory and > requirements information. I think we can make this initially much > briefer, like the Windows installation chapter. For example, instead > of documenting each setup option again, just mention which ones exist > and then point (link) to the configure chapter for details. The current docs, including the windows ones, are already hard to follow. I think we should take some care to not make the meson bits even more confusing. Cross referencing left and right seems problematic from that angle. > I spent a bit of time with the test suites. I think there is a > problem in that selecting a test suite directly, like > > meson test -C _build --suite recovery > > doesn't update the tmp_install. So if this is the first thing you run > after a build, everything will fail. Also, if you run this later, the > tmp_install doesn't get updated, so you're not testing up-to-date > code. At the moment creation of the tmp_install is its own test suite. I don't know if that's the best way, or what the best way is, but that explains that fact. You can do the above without the issue by specifying --suite setup --suite recovery. Greetings, Andres Freund
pgsql-hackers by date: