Hi,
On 2022-08-17 08:25:06 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> Regarding the question of whether we need a cleanup lock on the new
> bucket I am not really seeing the advantage of going down that path.
> Simply fixing this code to take a cleanup lock instead of hoping that
> it always gets one by accident is low risk and should fix the observed
> problem. Getting rid of the cleanup lock will be more invasive and I'd
> like to see some evidence that it's a necessary step before we take
> the risk of breaking things.
Given that the cleanup locks in question are "taken" *after* re-initializing
the page, I'm doubtful that's a sane path forward. It seems quite likely to
mislead somebody to rely on it working as a cleanup lock in the future.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
