On 2022-Aug-07, Andres Freund wrote:
> Rely on __func__ being supported
>
> Previously we fell back to __FUNCTION__ and then NULL. As __func__ is in C99
> that shouldn't be necessary anymore.
>
> Solution.pm defined HAVE_FUNCNAME__FUNCTION instead of
> HAVE_FUNCNAME__FUNC (originating in 4164e6636e2), as at some point in the past
> MSVC only supported __FUNCTION__. Our minimum version supports __func__.
I'd rather we keep PG_FUNCNAME_MACRO defined to __func__ ... it costs us
nothing. Would anybody oppose that?
--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
