Re: AIX support - alignment issues - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: AIX support - alignment issues
Date
Msg-id 20220702194205.nhit4wcm5mrgaxg3@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: AIX support - alignment issues  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2022-07-02 11:54:16 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> I tend to agree about dropping AIX. But I wonder if there is an
> argument against that proposal that doesn't rely on AIX being relevant
> to at least one user. Has supporting AIX ever led to the discovery of
> a bug that didn't just affect AIX?

Yes, it clearly has. But I tend to think that that's far outweighed by the
complications triggered by AIX support. It'd be a different story if AIX
hadn't a very peculiar linking model and was more widely accessible.


> What is the best argument *against* desupporting AIX that you know of?

Hm.

- a distinct set of system libraries that can help find portability issues

- With IBM's compiler it adds a, not otherwise used, compiler that PG builds
  with. So the warnings could theoretically help find issues that we wouldn't
  otherwise see - but I don't think that's been particularly useful (nor
  monitored). And the compiler is buggy enough to add a fair bit work over the
  years.


> Desupporting AIX doesn't mean that any AIX users will be left in the
> lurch immediately. Obviously these users will be able to use a
> supported version of Postgres for several more years.

Right.

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Steve Chavez
Date:
Subject: Re: Add red-black tree missing comparison searches
Next
From: "Dian M Fay"
Date:
Subject: Re: doc: Make selectivity example match wording