Thanks for the suggestions!
At Thu, 2 Jun 2022 14:39:41 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote in
> The change that you are sending would enforce this policy as Christoph
> would like. Some tests would be nice to check such behaviors, say in
Added a test.
> 001_basic.pl, but we also need to be careful when sending down queries
> with psql expected to fail because of SIGPIPE (c757a3d, 6d41dd0). The
This does not need to send a byte after the client-side failure. The
connection is rather living after failure in this case.
> docs need a refresh, they mention now that COMMIT is sent after the
> last command but that would not be the case anymore with this patch if
> there is a client-side error.
Agreed. Does the following work?
> It causes psql to issue a BEGIN command before the first such option
> and a COMMIT command after the last one, thereby wrapping all the
> commands into a single transaction.
+> If any of the commands fails, a ROLLBACK command is sent instead.
> This ensures that either all the commands complete successfully, or
> no changes are applied.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
