Re: 15beta1 test failure on mips in isolation/expected/stats - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: 15beta1 test failure on mips in isolation/expected/stats
Date
Msg-id 20220520035928.c5k267fgsxhtpbnt@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 15beta1 test failure on mips in isolation/expected/stats  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2022-05-19 22:58:14 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> What I am wondering about at this point is whether the effects of
> pg_stat_force_next_flush() could somehow be delayed until after we
> have told the client the command is complete.

It shouldn't - it just forces pg_stat_report_stat() to flush (rather than
doing so based on the time of the last report). And pg_stat_report_stat()
happens before ReadyForQuery().

Hm. Does the instability vanish if you switch s2_commit_prepared_a and s1_ff?

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Build-farm - intermittent error in 031_column_list.pl
Next
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: 15beta1 test failure on mips in isolation/expected/stats