Re: Intermittent buildfarm failures on wrasse - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Intermittent buildfarm failures on wrasse
Date
Msg-id 202205191021.fvy2wgxpxaak@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Intermittent buildfarm failures on wrasse  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
I was looking at backpatching this to pg13.  That made me realize that
commit dc7420c2c927 changed things in 14; and before that commit, the
bitmask that is checked is PROCARRAY_FLAGS_VACUUM, which has a
definition independently from whatever proc.h says.  As far as I can
tell, there's no problem with the patches I post here (the backpatched
version for pg13 and p14).  But's it's something to be aware of; and if
we do want to add the additional bits to the bitmask, we should do that
in a separate master-only commit.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera        Breisgau, Deutschland  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Build-farm - intermittent error in 031_column_list.pl
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Zstandard support for toast compression