Hi,
On 2022-04-04 10:02:37 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> It does a good job, I think, checking all the things that a human being
> could potentially spot just by looking at an individual page.
I think there's a few more things that'd be good to check. For example amcheck
doesn't verify that HOT chains are reasonable, which can often be spotted
looking at an individual page. Which is a bit unfortunate, given how many bugs
we had in that area.
Stuff to check around that:
- target of redirect has HEAP_ONLY_TUPLE, HEAP_UPDATED set
- In a valid ctid chain within a page (i.e. xmax = xmin):
- tuples have HEAP_UPDATED set
- HEAP_ONLY_TUPLE / HEAP_HOT_UPDATED matches across chains elements
I think it'd also be good to check for things like visible tuples following
invisible ones.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
