>> My machine (Ubuntu 20) did not complain either. Maybe perl version
>> difference? Any way, the fix pushed. Let's see how prairiedog feels.
>
> Still not happy. After some digging in man pages, I believe the
> problem is that its old version of Perl does not understand "\gN"
> backreferences. Is there a good reason to be using that rather
> than the traditional "\N" backref notation?
I don't see a reason to use "\gN" either. Actually after applying
attached patch, my machine is still happy with pgbench test.
Yugo?
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
diff --git a/src/bin/pgbench/t/001_pgbench_with_server.pl b/src/bin/pgbench/t/001_pgbench_with_server.pl
index 60cae1e843..22a23489e8 100644
--- a/src/bin/pgbench/t/001_pgbench_with_server.pl
+++ b/src/bin/pgbench/t/001_pgbench_with_server.pl
@@ -1224,7 +1224,7 @@ my $err_pattern =
"(client (0|1) sending UPDATE xy SET y = y \\+ -?\\d+\\b).*"
. "client \\g2 got an error in command 3 \\(SQL\\) of script 0; "
. "ERROR: could not serialize access due to concurrent update\\b.*"
- . "\\g1";
+ . "\\1";
$node->pgbench(
"-n -c 2 -t 1 -d --verbose-errors --max-tries 2",
