Re: shared-memory based stats collector - v67 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: shared-memory based stats collector - v67
Date
Msg-id 20220323174203.iadlh77qbojvji3k@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: shared-memory based stats collector - v67  (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2022-03-23 17:27:50 +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> At Mon, 21 Mar 2022 14:30:17 -0700, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote in 
> > > Right now we reset stats for replicas, even if we start from a shutdown
> > > checkpoint. That seems pretty unnecessary with this patch:
> > > - 0021-pgstat-wip-only-reset-pgstat-data-after-crash-re.patch
> > 
> > Might raise this in another thread for higher visibility.
> 
> +    /*
> +     * When starting with crash recovery, reset pgstat data - it might not be
> +     * valid. Otherwise restore pgstat data. It's safe to do this here,
> +     * because postmaster will not yet have started any other processes
> +     *
> +     * TODO: With a bit of extra work we could just start with a pgstat file
> +     * associated with the checkpoint redo location we're starting from.
> +     */
> +    if (ControlFile->state == DB_SHUTDOWNED ||
> +        ControlFile->state == DB_SHUTDOWNED_IN_RECOVERY)
> +        pgstat_restore_stats();
> +    else
> +        pgstat_discard_stats();
> +
> 
> Before there, InitWalRecovery changes the state to
> DB_IN_ARCHIVE_RECOVERY if it was either DB_SHUTDOWNED or
> DB_IN_PRODUCTION. So the stat seems like always discarded on standby.

Hm. I though it worked at some point. I guess there's a reason this commit is
a separate commit marked WIP ;)


> In the first place, I'm not sure it is valid that a standby from a
> cold backup takes over the stats from the primary.

I don't really see a reason not to use the stats in that case - we have a
correct stats file after all. But it doesn't seem too important. What I
actually find worth addressing is the case of standbys starting in
DB_SHUTDOWNED_IN_RECOVERY. Right now we always throw stats away after a
*graceful* restart of a standby, which doesn't seem great.

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Parameter for planner estimate of recursive queries
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: ubsan