Re: archive modules - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: archive modules
Date
Msg-id 20220203212539.GA1082940@nathanxps13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: archive modules  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: archive modules
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 04:15:30PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 4:11 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 04:04:33PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> > So apparently we need to either skip this test when wal_level=minimal,
>> > or force a higher wal_level to be used for this particular test. Not
>> > sure what the existing precedents are, if any.
>>
>> The only precedent I've found so far is test_decoding, which sets wal_level
>> to "logical."  Perhaps we can just set it to "replica" in
>> basic_archive.conf.
> 
> Yeah, that seems to make sense.

024_archive_recovery.pl seems to do something similar.  Patch attached.

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: John Naylor
Date:
Subject: Re: do only critical work during single-user vacuum?
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: archive modules