On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 4:11 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 04:04:33PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > So apparently we need to either skip this test when wal_level=minimal,
> > or force a higher wal_level to be used for this particular test. Not
> > sure what the existing precedents are, if any.
>
> The only precedent I've found so far is test_decoding, which sets wal_level
> to "logical." Perhaps we can just set it to "replica" in
> basic_archive.conf.
Yeah, that seems to make sense.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
