Re: archive modules - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: archive modules
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYE7hSUUMfNwKOzHBQ+x6Ge9ThiDbQHXCZ5ty=fGQf7YA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: archive modules  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: archive modules  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 4:25 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
> 024_archive_recovery.pl seems to do something similar.  Patch attached.

Committed. I think this is mostly an issue for pg_regress tests, as
opposed to 024_archive_recovery.pl, which is a TAP test. Maybe I'm
wrong about that, but it looks to me like most TAP tests choose what
they want explicitly, while pg_regress tests tend to inherit the
value.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: archive modules
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: do only critical work during single-user vacuum?