At Fri, 14 Jan 2022 22:49:59 +0000, "Kingsborough, Alex" <kingsboa@amazon.com> wrote in
> The fix for this is very simple
>
>
> /* if we wrote out all subxids, we're done. /
> - if (j + 1 >= nsubxids)
> + if (j >= nsubxids)
> break;
It looks like a thinko and the fix is correct. (It's a matter of taste
choosing between it and "j == nsubxids").
I found some confusing lines around but they need not a fix
considering back-patching conflict?
> for (i = 0, headxid = xid;;)
..
> i += j - i + 1;
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
