Re: Unifying VACUUM VERBOSE and log_autovacuum_min_duration output - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Unifying VACUUM VERBOSE and log_autovacuum_min_duration output
Date
Msg-id 20211211202444.m52fl2bclt72mktn@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Unifying VACUUM VERBOSE and log_autovacuum_min_duration output  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: Unifying VACUUM VERBOSE and log_autovacuum_min_duration output
List pgsql-hackers
On 2021-12-11 09:52:29 -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 8:30 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > I think some actually ended up being omitted compared to the previous
> > state. E.g. "aggressively vacuuming ...", but I think others as well.
> 
> The "aggressive-ness" is reported by a distinct ereport() with the
> patch, so you'll still see that information.

But the ereport is inside an if (verbose), no?



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Rob Gansevles
Date:
Subject: Building postgresql from sources, statically linked, linux
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Unifying VACUUM VERBOSE and log_autovacuum_min_duration output