On 2021-Oct-26, Aleksander Alekseev wrote:
> > In short: I'm not okay with doing
> > s/MakeTupleTableSlot/MakeSingleTupleTableSlot/g in a patch that doesn't
> > also introduce matching ExecDropSingleTupleTableSlot calls (unless those
> > exist somewhere already; but where?). If we did clean that up, maybe
> > MakeTupleTableSlot could become "static". But I'd still be inclined to
> > keep it physically separate, leaving it to the compiler to decide whether
> > to inline it into the callers.
Another point that could be made is that perhaps
MakeSingleTupleTableSlot should always construct a slot using virtual
tuples rather than passing TTSOps as a parameter?
--
Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Ellos andaban todos desnudos como su madre los parió, y también las mujeres,
aunque no vi más que una, harto moza, y todos los que yo vi eran todos
mancebos, que ninguno vi de edad de más de XXX años" (Cristóbal Colón)
