Re: ldap/t/001_auth.pl fails with openldap 2.5 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: ldap/t/001_auth.pl fails with openldap 2.5
Date
Msg-id 20211019182016.aa6kjrenfk4jkxlg@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ldap/t/001_auth.pl fails with openldap 2.5  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2021-10-10 00:45:41 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> > Although I'm mildly tempted to rewrap the parameters, it's kinda odd how the
> > trailing parameter on one line, has its value on the next line.
> 
> I'm betting that perltidy did that.  If you want to fix it so it
> stays fixed, maybe reordering the parameters could help.

You were right on that front. Since perltidy insisted on reflowing due to the
reduction in number of parameters anyway, I did end up switching things around
so that the parameters look a bit more reasonable.

> > So, does anybody see a reason not to go for the trivial
> > [ patch ]
> 
> I'd be happy to rely on the buildfarm's opinion here.

Let's see what it says...

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel vacuum workers prevent the oldest xmin from advancing
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] test/ssl: rework the sslfiles Makefile target