Re: when the startup process doesn't (logging startup delays) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: when the startup process doesn't (logging startup delays)
Date
Msg-id 202109291752.czuv2a3bedbt@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: when the startup process doesn't (logging startup delays)  (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>)
Responses Re: when the startup process doesn't (logging startup delays)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2021-Sep-29, Justin Pryzby wrote:

> Robert requested the current behavior here.
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BTgmoYkS1ZeWdSMFMBecMNxWonHk6J5eoX4FEQrpKtvEbXqGQ%40mail.gmail.com
> 
> It's confusing (at least) to get these kind of requests to change the behavior
> back and forth.

Well, I did scan the thread to see if this had been discussed, and I
overlooked that message.  But there was no reply to that message, so
it's not clear whether this was just Robert's opinion or consensus; in
fact we now have exactly two votes on it (mine and Robert's).

I think one person casting an opinion on one aspect does not set that
aspect in stone.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera         PostgreSQL Developer  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"It takes less than 2 seconds to get to 78% complete; that's a good sign.
A few seconds later it's at 90%, but it seems to have stuck there.  Did
somebody make percentages logarithmic while I wasn't looking?"
                http://smylers.hates-software.com/2005/09/08/1995c749.html



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: when the startup process doesn't (logging startup delays)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUG] failed assertion in EnsurePortalSnapshotExists()