Re: PoC Refactor AM analyse API - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jaime Casanova
Subject Re: PoC Refactor AM analyse API
Date
Msg-id 20210908150625.GA6483@ahch-to
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PoC Refactor AM analyse API  (Denis Smirnov <sd@arenadata.io>)
Responses Re: PoC Refactor AM analyse API  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 12:06:12PM +1000, Denis Smirnov wrote:
> Thanks for your review, Heikki.
> 
> I have made the changes you have requested.
> 
> 1. All modifications interconnected with column projection were reverted (they should be added in
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/31/2922if the current patch would be merged one day).
 
> 2. I have returned PROGRESS_ANALYZE_* states.
> 3. qsort() was moved into heapam_acquire_sample_rows(). Also a comment was added, that the acquire_sample_rows() AM
functionmust return the tuples in a physical table order.
 
> 4. table_beginscan_analyze() was removed as a redundant function.
> 5. acquire_sample_rows() comment about reservoir was changed.
> 

Hi Denis,

This doesn't apply anymore because of c6fc50c, can you resubmit a new
patch?

Please note that the patch must be submitted with a .patch extension
instead of .txt, that way the CI at http://commitfest.cputube.org/ will
be able to execute automatic tests on it.

Regards,

-- 
Jaime Casanova
Director de Servicios Profesionales
SystemGuards - Consultores de PostgreSQL



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Use "superuser" instead of "super user" in code comments
Next
From: Jaime Casanova
Date:
Subject: Re: LogwrtResult contended spinlock