Re: Use "superuser" instead of "super user" in code comments - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Gustafsson
Subject Re: Use "superuser" instead of "super user" in code comments
Date
Msg-id BEE2A08D-47D3-4084-9245-BE330644FB04@yesql.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Use "superuser" instead of "super user" in code comments  (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> On 7 Sep 2021, at 15:48, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 6:40 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
>>
>>> On 7 Sep 2021, at 14:44, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It seems like we use "superuser" as a standard term across the entire
>>> code base i.e. error messages, docs, code comments. But there are
>>> still a few code comments that use the term "super user". Can we
>>> replace those with "superuser"? Attaching a tiny patch to do that.
>>
>> Good catch, superuser is the term we should use for this.  There is one
>> additional “super user” in src/test/regress/sql/conversion.sql (and its
>> corresponding resultfile) which can be included in this.  Unless there are
>> objections I’ll apply this with the testfile fixup.
>
> Thanks for picking this up. Here's v2 including the change in
> conversion.sql and .out.

Done, thanks!

--
Daniel Gustafsson        https://vmware.com/




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Wu Haotian
Date:
Subject: Re: Add option --drop-cascade for pg_dump/restore
Next
From: Jaime Casanova
Date:
Subject: Re: PoC Refactor AM analyse API