Re: pg_veryfybackup can fail with a valid backup for TLI > 1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

At Mon, 23 Aug 2021 15:46:37 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote in 
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 04:47:15PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> > Yes, backup_label looks correct.
> > 
> > backup_label (extract):
> > START WAL LOCATION: 0/5000028 (file 000000020000000000000005)
> > CHECKPOINT LOCATION: 0/5000060
> > START TIMELINE: 2
> 
> Okay.  I have worked on that today, did more manual tests, and applied
> this fix down to 13.  The cherry-pick from 14 to 13 only required a
> s/$master/$primary/ in the test, which was straight-forward.  Your
> patch for 13 did that though:
> -                       if (starttli != entry->tli)
> +                       if (!XLogRecPtrIsInvalid(entry->begin))
> 
> So it would have caused a failure with parent TLIs that have a correct
> begin location, but we expect the opposite.  The patch for 14/HEAD had
> that right.

Mmm. Sorry for the silly mistake, and thanks for commiting this!

regards.

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center