On Sun, Aug 08, 2021 at 09:37:52AM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 08, 2021 at 04:31:07PM +0500, Andrey Borodin wrote:
> > Step 1. Test for CIC with regular transactions.
> > Step 2. Fix
> > Step 3. Test for CIC with 2PC
> > Step 4. Part of the fix that I'm sure about
> > Step 5. Dubious part of fix...
When I applied all five to commit b33259e^ (shortly before the PostgresNode
compatibility break) and ran your tests in a loop, I got more 2PC "lacks
matching index tuple" within one minute. Here's how I ran the tests:
make -j20 && while make -C contrib/amcheck check REGRESS= PROVE_FLAGS=--timer PROVE_TESTS='t/002_cic.pl
t/003_cic_2pc.pl'NO_TEMP_INSTALL=1; do date; done
Do you see failures with that loop? If so, can you diagnose them? (So far,
I've not seen a failure from the 1PC test.)
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 10:25:48PM -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> I haven't checked whether other inval message types have the same hazard.
I will look into this next. (It probably doesn't explain 2PC failures.)
