Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys
Date
Msg-id 202107281526.o74ieuj6sj7z@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys  ("Drouvot, Bertrand" <bdrouvot@amazon.com>)
Responses Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys  ("Drouvot, Bertrand" <bdrouvot@amazon.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2021-Jul-27, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:

> diff --git a/src/backend/utils/cache/lsyscache.c b/src/backend/utils/cache/lsyscache.c

> +bool
> +get_rel_logical_catalog(Oid relid)
> +{
> +    bool    res;
> +    Relation rel;
> +
> +    /* assume previously locked */
> +    rel = table_open(relid, NoLock);
> +    res = RelationIsAccessibleInLogicalDecoding(rel);
> +    table_close(rel, NoLock);
> +
> +    return res;
> +}

So RelationIsAccessibleInLogicalDecoding() does a cheap check for
wal_level which can be done without opening the table; I think this
function should be rearranged to avoid doing that when not needed.
Also, putting this function in lsyscache.c seems somewhat wrong since
it's not merely accessing the system caches ...

I think it would be better to move this elsewhere (relcache.c, proto in
relcache.h, perhaps call it RelationIdIsAccessibleInLogicalDecoding) and
short-circuit for the check that can be done before opening the table.
At least the GiST code appears to be able to call this several times per
vacuum run, so it makes sense to short-circuit it for the fast case.

... though looking at the GiST code again I wonder if it would be more
sensible to just stash the table's Relation pointer somewhere in the
context structs instead of opening and closing it time and again.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera         PostgreSQL Developer  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Investigación es lo que hago cuando no sé lo que estoy haciendo"
(Wernher von Braun)



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: when the startup process doesn't (logging startup delays)
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Have I found an interval arithmetic bug?