Re: something is wonky with pgbench pipelining - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: something is wonky with pgbench pipelining
Date
Msg-id 20210721235508.nefqq2r5vx4as7op@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: something is wonky with pgbench pipelining  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Responses Re: something is wonky with pgbench pipelining
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2021-07-20 14:57:15 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2021-Jul-20, Andres Freund wrote:
> 
> > I think what's happening is that the first recvfrom() actually gets all 7
> > connection results. The server doesn't have any queries to process at that
> > point. But we ask the kernel whether there is new network input over and over
> > again, despite having results to process!
> 
> Hmm, yeah, that seems a missed opportunity.

> > with-isbusy:
> > ...
> > tps = 3990.424742 (without initial connection time)
> > ...
> >           1,013.71 msec task-clock                #    0.202 CPUs utilized
> >             80,203      raw_syscalls:sys_enter    #   79.119 K/sec
> >             19,947      context-switches          #   19.677 K/sec
> >      2,943,676,361      cycles:u                  #    2.904 GHz
> >        346,607,769      cycles:k                  #    0.342 GHz
> >      8,464,188,379      instructions:u            #    2.88  insn per cycle
> >        226,665,530      instructions:k            #    0.65  insn per cycle
> 
> This is quite compelling.
> 
> If you don't mind I can get this pushed soon in the next couple of days
> -- or do you want to do it yourself?

I was thinking of pushing the attached, to both 14 and master, thinking
that was what you meant, but then I wasn't quite sure: It's a relatively
minor performance improvement, after all? OTOH, it arguably also just is
a bit of an API misuse...

I'm inclined to push it to 14 and master, but ...

Greetings,

Andres Freund

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Using a stock openssl BIO
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Have I found an interval arithmetic bug?