On 2021-Jul-09, Amul Sul wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 11:06 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > > The point of the static-inline function idea was to be cheap enough
> > > that it isn't worth worrying about this sort of risky optimization.
> > > Given that an smgr function is sure to involve some kernel calls,
> > > I doubt it's worth sweating over an extra test-and-branch beforehand.
> > > So where I was hoping to get to is that smgr objects are *only*
> > > referenced by RelationGetSmgr() calls and nobody ever keeps any
> > > other pointers to them across any non-smgr operations.
> Herewith attached version did the same, thanks.
I think it would be valuable to have a comment in that function to point
out what is the function there for.
--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Industry suffers from the managerial dogma that for the sake of stability
and continuity, the company should be independent of the competence of
individual employees." (E. Dijkstra)
