Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Julien Rouhaud
Subject Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements
Date
Msg-id 20210619044907.pnwm5qdre5xctya2@nol
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 11:24:00AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 10:24:20AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Maybe "if true, pstmt's node tree must not be modified" ?
> 
> > Thanks, I find it way better!
> 
> OK, pushed that way, and with a couple other comment tweaks from
> an additional re-reading.

Thanks!  For the record I already pushed the required compatibility changes for
hypopg extension.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft
Next
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: Failures with gcd functions with GCC snapshots GCC and -O3 (?)