Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements
Date
Msg-id 1162082.1624029840@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 10:24:20AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Maybe "if true, pstmt's node tree must not be modified" ?

> Thanks, I find it way better!

OK, pushed that way, and with a couple other comment tweaks from
an additional re-reading.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements
Next
From: Yugo NAGATA
Date:
Subject: Re: pgbench bug candidate: negative "initial connection time"