Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Julien Rouhaud
Subject Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements
Date
Msg-id 20210618151545.zamlaguxt4tudyjw@nol
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 10:24:20AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 01:03:29PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > + *    readOnlyTree: treat pstmt's node tree as read-only
> 
> > Maybe it's because I'm not a native english speaker, or because it's quite
> > late here, but I don't find "treat as read-only" really clear.  I don't have a
> > concise better wording to suggest.
> 
> Maybe "if true, pstmt's node tree must not be modified" ?

Thanks, I find it way better!



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Add version macro to libpq-fe.h
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements