On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 23:29:30 +0200 (CEST)
Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote:
>
> Bonjour Michaël,
>
> Here is an updated patch. While having a look at Kyotaro-san patch, I
> noticed that the aggregate stuff did not print the last aggregate. I think
> that it is a side effect of switching the precision from per-second to
> per-µs. I've done an attempt at also fixing that which seems to work.
This is just out of curiosity.
+ while ((next = agg->start_time + agg_interval * INT64CONST(1000000)) <= now)
I can find the similar code to convert "seconds" to "us" using casting like
end_time = threads[0].create_time + (int64) 1000000 * duration;
or
next_report = last_report + (int64) 1000000 * progress;
Is there a reason use INT64CONST instead of (int64)? Do these imply the same effect?
Sorry, if this is a dumb question...
Regards,
Yugo Nagata
--
Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
