On 2021-Jun-12, Tom Lane wrote:
> Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 8:56 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >> I was thinking maybe we could mark all these replication protocol
> >> violation errors non-translatable. While we don't want to crash on a
> >> protocol violation, it shouldn't really be a user-facing case either.
>
> > I don't see any problem with that as these are not directly related to
> > any user operation. So, +1 for making these non-translatable.
>
> Done that way.
Good call, thanks. Not only it's not very useful to translate such
messages, but it's also quite a burden because some of them are
difficult to translate.
--
Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile
"Tiene valor aquel que admite que es un cobarde" (Fernandel)
