Re: Error on pgbench logs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kyotaro Horiguchi
Subject Re: Error on pgbench logs
Date
Msg-id 20210611.155655.1369834005135867832.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Error on pgbench logs  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: Error on pgbench logs  (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
At Fri, 11 Jun 2021 15:23:41 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote in 
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 11:29:30PM +0200, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> > +        /* flush remaining stats */
> > +        if (!logged && latency == 0.0)
> > +            logAgg(logfile, agg);
> 
> You are right, this is missing the final stats.  Why the choice of
> latency here for the check?  That's just to make the difference
> between the case where doLog() is called while processing the
> benchmark for the end of the transaction and the case where doLog() is
> called once a thread ends, no?  Wouldn't it be better to do a final
> push of the states once a thread reaches CSTATE_FINISHED or
> CSTATE_ABORTED instead?

Doesn't threadRun already doing that?

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: Duplicate history file?
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Added missing tab completion for alter subscription set option