Re: ML-based indexing ("The Case for Learned Index Structures", a paper from Google) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: ML-based indexing ("The Case for Learned Index Structures", a paper from Google)
Date
Msg-id 20210421134640.GB11327@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ML-based indexing ("The Case for Learned Index Structures", a paper from Google)  (Stefan Keller <sfkeller@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: ML-based indexing ("The Case for Learned Index Structures", a paper from Google)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 10:52:19AM +0200, Stefan Keller wrote:
> Di., 20. Apr. 2021 23:50 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > There's enough support these days that you can build a new index
> > type as an extension, without touching the core code at all.
> 
> Thanks. I'm ramping up knowledge about extending PG with C++.
> 
> I'm still interested to understand in principle what an index has to
> do with concurrency control, in order to divide
> concerns/reponsibilities of code.

The issue is that some index structures, like bitmap indexes, have very
poor concurrent performance.  This means that some indexes perform very
well for a single user but poorly for multiple users.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Honza Horak
Date:
Subject: Re: Do we work with LLVM 12 on s390x?
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: multi-install PostgresNode fails with older postgres versions