On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 07:24:54AM +0000, Niels Jespersen wrote:
> Hello all
>
> Are these two queries exactly eqivalent? The table is partitioned on
> r_time, which is a timestamptz. The explain plans are not exactly the
> same. The first wants to scan a partition more than the latter.
>
> select f.xx from f
> where f.r_time >= '2020-10-01 00:00:00+00'::timestamptz
> and f.r_time < ('2020-10-01 00:00:00+00'::timestamptz + interval '1 month');
>
> select f.xx from f
> where f.r_time >= '2020-10-01 00:00:00+00'::timestamptz
> and f.r_time < ('2020-11-01 00:00:00+00'::timestamptz);
It depends on timezone.
For example, in my timezone:
$ select ('2020-10-01 00:00:00+00'::timestamptz + interval '1 month'), '2020-11-01 00:00:00+00'::timestamptz;
?column? │ timestamptz
────────────────────────┼────────────────────────
2020-11-01 02:00:00+01 │ 2020-11-01 01:00:00+01
(1 row)
Please note that there is 1 hour difference.
The reason is that somewhere in there we change time due to daylight
savings.
If I'd set timezone to UTC, suddently it's the same:
$ set timezone=UTC;
SET
$ select ('2020-10-01 00:00:00+00'::timestamptz + interval '1 month') = '2020-11-01 00:00:00+00'::timestamptz;
?column?
──────────
t
(1 row)
As usual - time is more complicated than one could expect.
Best regards,
depesz
