On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 06:24:07PM +0000, Bossart, Nathan wrote:
> LGTM. I just have a few small wording suggestions.
>
> + completion overhead. Reducing this parameter is not recommended as that
> + causes the I/O from the checkpoint to have to complete faster, resulting
> + in a higher I/O rate, while then having a period of less I/O between the
> + completion of the checkpoint and the start of the next scheduled
> + checkpoint. This parameter can only be set in the
>
> Reducing this parameter is not recommended because it forces the
> checkpoint to complete faster. This results in a higher rate of I/O
> during the checkpoint followed by a period of less I/O between
> checkpoint completion and the next scheduled checkpoint.
FYI, I am very happy this issue is being addressed for PG 14. :-)
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.
