Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 01:25:15PM -0400, Jan Wieck wrote:
> On 3/23/21 10:56 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Would it be better to allow pg_upgrade to pass arbitrary arguments to
> > pg_restore, instead of just these specific ones?
> > 
> 
> That would mean arbitrary parameters to pg_dump as well as pg_restore. But
> yes, that would probably be better in the long run.
> 
> Any suggestion as to how that would actually look like? Unfortunately
> pg_restore has -[dDoOr] already used, so it doesn't look like there will be
> any naturally intelligible short options for that.

We have the postmaster which can pass arbitrary arguments to postgres
processes using -o.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.