Re: Key management with tests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Key management with tests
Date
Msg-id 20210112181106.b75t5na7cdxno6dm@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Key management with tests  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2021-01-12 13:03:14 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I think one big question is that, since we are using a streaming cipher,
> do we care about hint bit changes showing to users?  I actually don't
> know.  If we do, some kind of dummy LSN record might be required, as you
> suggested.

That'd lead to a *massive* increase of WAL record volume. It's one thing
to WAL log hint bit writes once per page per checkpoint. It's another to
do so on every single hint bit write.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Key management with tests
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Key management with tests