On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 03:00:32PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> I agree with Stephen; so maybe that part of the Wiki needs to be updated
> instead of having it sit there for use as a hammer when someone disagrees with
> a proffered patch.
>
> Or maybe consider that "a patch" doesn't only mean "implement" - it is simply
> another language through which desirability and design can also be
> communicated. The author gets to decide how wordy their prose is and choosing
> a wordy but concise language that is understandable by the vast majority of the
> target audience seems like it should be considered acceptable.
If you want to debate that TODO section, you will need to start a new
thread. I suggest Alastair's patch also appear in a new thread.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
