Re: Proposed patch for key managment - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Proposed patch for key managment
Date
Msg-id 20201205020803.GA8757@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Proposed patch for key managment  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Proposed patch for key managment
Re: Proposed patch for key managment
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Dec  2, 2020 at 04:38:14PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> If most people approve of this general approach, and the design
> decisions made, I would like to apply this in the next few weeks, but
> this brings complications.  The syntax added by this commit might not
> provide a useful feature until PG 15, so how do we hide it from users. 
> I was thinking of not applying the doc changes (or commenting them out)
> and commenting out the --help output.

Here is an updated patch to handle the new hash API introduced by
commit 87ae9691d2.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             https://enterprisedb.com

  The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: convert elog(LOG) calls to ereport